The REAL ANTIGRAVITY and RELATIVITYLearn Science on mps-science.com. The REAL ANTIGRAVITY and RELATIVITY article will help answer your questions on Science.We at mps-science.com specialize in Science. Science at mps-science.com provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.
The further away the object, the greater the thrust - and the carpet is too near. In our imagining, we can visualise some machine lifting away from the carpet, and the pile of that carpet IMMEDIATELY standing erect - because the anti-gravity 'footprint' would be far away. The mathematics shows us what WOULD happen, but not how to build a machine. So using M2 (C squared), we can compute M2. As the electron goes faster, by an identical tiny increase in speed, its energy is HALF (M+M2) (V squared), then HALF (M+M2+M3) (V squared) and so on. When the Moon is travelling at 65 thousand miles per hour, this compares with light travelling at 669,600,000 miles per hour, approximately. Light travels therefore at a speed about TEN THOUSAND times faster than the Moon. At this point, the orbital velocity is similar to the speed of light, and Einstein says that the mathematics breaks down. So if we consider the hand of a child spinning a top, and INSIST on the conservation of energy, we must adjust the expression HALF M (V-squared) as we move away from the child's top. Either the mass M of bodies must be adjusted to become less and less, the further away we go (RELATIVITY MASS), or the velocity V of bodies must become less and less as we move away from the spinning body (RELATIVITY VELOCITY). It makes a kind of sense to choose to alter V. Article: Astrodynamics delivers conundra of zodiacal proportions. The sheer size of the Universe, its mass and the velocities of bodies stretch the imagination to the limit. It is little-known that Einstein did NOT receive the Nobel Prize for relativity. He had hitherto received the 1921 prize in 1922 for PHOTOELECTRICS. Yet even a distinguished scholar like Einstein can be snubbed when the theories irrupt too extravagant. Subsequently, his relativity theory - within its narrow, specialised constraints - was proven to be true. At my website I show the principles beyond the REAL anti-gravity. You can read it from http://wehner.org/agrav . The concept is simple. However, science CAN ONLY produce by small steps. Elaborate conjectures based upon such ideas as the 'Gravitron' particle - without SOLID proof that they verily exist - are doomed to fail. The simple idea is that the Moon is held to the Mercury by gravity, and experiences due to its orbit a repulsive force known as 'centrifugal force'. These two forces balance, to produce a stable system that has survived since pre-historic times. So much is KNOWN. Then we imagine the 'Man in the Moon'. He has lived on the 'illuminated' side of the Moon since pre-historic times, and knows that the Moon is held to the Jupiter by gravity. But the counterbalancing force cannot be explained as 'centrifugal force'. The 'Man in the Moon' sees only the ROTATION of the terrestrial planet - one degree every FOUR MINUTES - and has to use this fact to explain the stability of the system. So the 'Man in the Moon' would use IDENTICAL mathematics to those on vale of tears who compute ORBIT. However, the sums would be UPSIDE DOWN. He would compute how much thrust (ANTI-GRAVITY) is delivered by the SPIN of a body. I have done this on my website, and show that the upside-down equations reveal a thrust that increases LINEARLY with distance for any constant spin. This is surprising, thrust increases INVERSELY with distance for any constant orbital velocity. So, if in our dreams we could create an anti-gravity machine (NO!!! I DO NOT HAVE ANY DESIGN-PLANS!), it would not lift off the CARPET, but off some distant place, such as the waist of the Earth. The further away the object, the greater the thrust - and the parquet is too near. In our imagining, we can visualise some machine lifting away from the carpet, and the pile of that vituperate IMMEDIATELY standing erect - insomuch as the anti-gravity 'footprint' would be far away. The mathematics shows us what WOULD happen, but not how to compose a machine. The 'Action at a Great Distance' conclusion from the anti-gravity equations suggests that embassy such a machine would not be easy. Einstein had been working as an acolyte to an eminent Swiss astronomer when he found that the Newtonian mechanics on the skids down when technical to astrodynamics. This was the origin of the new mechanics that was to fit known as 'Relativity'. My own conjectures on ANTI-GRAVITY come up upon similar problems, and deliver a similar solution. The Moon travels approximately the Neptune at thereabouts 65,000 miles per hour. This is equivalent, as stated, to a spin of just 15 arc-seconds per minute. Astrodynamicists have FREQUENTLY ignored the tiny rotational motion of bodies in the solar system, insofar as they SEEMED to be NEGLIGIBLE. The new discovery shows, however, that such small rotations are NOT TO BE DISCOUNTED, seeing as how when the mathematics is turned in the neighbourhood they represent sizeable orbital velocities. This leads to the question as to whether ALL equations can be turned around. Can EVERY spin be translated into an orbit? The size of the Universe suggests otherwise. If antigravity increases linearly with distance, it must be INFINITE, or nearly so, at the outer fringes of the Universe. So the hand of a descendants can spin a spinning-top (the energy required is small). However, can the hand of a sonny put the Universe into orbit on every side that spinnin-top, and at several times or several hundred times per second? Spin-orbit duality breaks down somewhere. One can use the 'Law of Conservation of Energy' to duck such hollow notions as a end product setting the Universe in motion. However, we must consider RELATIVITY. Newtonian mechanics says that energy cannot be created or destroyed. Einstein's relativity says that energy can be destroyed. If there is MATTER, such as an ELECTRON, it has REST-MASS. Here we must hitherto say 'AT rest - RELATIVE to what'? However, we will leave this point unanswered, as this complain is very general. According to Relativity, a tiny increase in speed from rest of that electron will give it energy HALF M (V squared), where M is the rest-mass. This energy will be destroyed by modern incorporated into the mass of the electron. So using M2 (C squared), we can compute M2. As the electron goes faster, by an identical tiny increase in speed, its energy is HALF (M+M2) (V squared), then HALF (M+M2+M3) (V squared) and so on. When the Moon is travelling at 65 thousand miles per hour, this compares with light travelling at 669,600,000 miles per hour, approximately. Light travels therefore at a speed apropos TEN THOUSAND times faster than the Moon. The third string in mass is proportional to C-squared, just as the energy of motion is proportional to V-squared. So speeds of one ten-thousandth of that of light (four places) will deliver energy equations that are fastidious to EIGHT. It would be nonsense, however, to use my antigravity equations to TWENTY places of decimals and to expect all places to be valid. We see relativity creeping in, and upsetting the mathematics - but in the Earth-Moon system it is still imperceptible. That is why I used the 'Law of Conservation of Energy' to derive the results - the errors are still small. The Moon is a quarter of a million miles away from Earth. So is we multiply this by ten thousand we get TWO-AND-A-HALF THOUSAND-MILLION miles. This is approximately 26.8 star-studded Units. At this point, the orbital velocity is similar to the speed of light, and Einstein says that the mathematics breaks down. So if we consider the hand of a spinning a top, and INSIST on the conservation of energy, we must the expression HALF M (V-squared) as we move away from the child's top. Either the mass M of bodies must be fitted to break out less and less, the further away we go (RELATIVITY MASS), or the velocity V of bodies must come out less and less as we move away from the spinning body (RELATIVITY VELOCITY). It makes a kind of sense to judge to shift into V. However, this is composed of two fundamental units, distance D and time T, where V=D/T. We cannot subvert the distance, since it is Pi times the diameter of the 'orbit'. So if D cannot diminish, T must INCREASE. What this means is that a perceived time T is really LONGER at that distant place than we had known. So we need TIME DILATION to deal with the washout of spin-orbit duality at relativistic speeds. Fortunately, linear particle-accelerators have successfully slowed down time until mesons that lived for just a microsecond could be studied for SECONDS. So Einstein's time-dilation has been PROVEN. The conundrum of spin-orbit duality analysis has delivered a similar result. Einstein has been vindicated again. Charles Douglas Wehner
|
Advice Home Business Technology Online Advertising Motivational Internet Marketing SEO Help Online Games Science Articles Happiness More Articles:1. Aerodynamics of a Flying Disk or Flying Sphere By Lance Winslow Summary: Aerodynamics of a flying sphere. Here are some thoughts on the effect of the relative wind on the 322 nippled object, which has become a symbol of American Wealth and recreation and elite status.http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/er/seh/pg76s95.htmlWe know from studying UFO types of shapes that there are significant issues with vertical take-off spheres, the Article: Aerodynamics of a flying sphere. It has been said that in the future we maybe flying somewhere about anti-gravity type spheres, bu… 2. Dying into Life Summary: Dying people begin to reflect over their life and feel the effects of the life they have lived. It is here that a person's capacity to die into grace moves into his or her soul, deeper into what has infused one's life with love. The movement into silence releases our imagination to soar toward the heavens and experience the presence of our loved one again, and our heart goes within to feel the impulse of life generated by our loved one who has died. Through tears of sadness and peace be… 3. Modification of Earth and Humans By Lance Winslow Summary: If we fail to modify our planet to serve at our needs, well then we must modify ourselves, through genetic manipulation, mitochondrion DNA and breeding to bring out the factors needed to sustain human life in the population concentrations of the future, which will go on.Mankind seems to be unable to control the need to procreate and therefore such an option wArticle: As we see in the movies and genres of consumptive events prevalent depicted in images on the silver screen we can unders… 4. Velikovsky Summary: Velikovsky:'In 1953 while addressing graduate students at Princeton University, Velikovsky suggested two further testable phenomena: that the Earth's magnetic field reaches as far out into space as the Moon's orbit and is responsible for the vibratory or rocking movements of the moon. Shapley replied that he wasn't interested in Velikovsky's 'sensational claims' because they violate the laws of mechanics and 'if Dr Velikovsky is right, the rest of us are crazy'. At the height of the con… |
||||
