The NSTP Theoretical Resolution of Zeno's ParadoxesLearn Science on mps-science.com. The NSTP Theoretical Resolution of Zeno's Paradoxes article will help answer your questions on Science.We at mps-science.com specialize in Science. Science at mps-science.com provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.
( See Simon Blackburn : Dictionary of Philosophy, 1996 ) The German set theorist Adolf Frankel ( 1891 - 1965 ) is one of many modern mathematicians ( Bertrand Russell is another ) who have pointed out that 2,000 years of attempted explanations have not cleared away the mysteries of Zeno's Paradoxes : 'Although they have often been dismissed as logical nonsense, many attempts have also been made to dispose of them by means of mathematical theorems, such as the theory of convergent series or the theory of sets. The only thing is that they, the thoughts, produce some dynamic spatial pattern ( actually / physically represented in the form of appropriate non - spatial states of consciousness ), as if a mover moving or the faster overtaking the slower. The same is true with the Article: Zeno of Elea's (b.490 BC) arguments con motion precipitated a crisis in gift of tongues thought. All of these, concerning motion, have had a profound influence on the development of mathematics. They are described in Aristotle's great work 'Physics' and are presented as four arguments in the form of paradoxes, stated subsequent to : 1. The Racecourse or Dichotomy Paradox - There is no motion for that which is moved must hit town at the middle of its course formerly it arrives at the end. In order to traverse a line segment it's necessary to reach the halfway point, but this requires first reaching the quarter - way point, which first requires reaching the eighth - way point, and so on without end. Hence motion can never begin. This problem isn't alleviated by the well - known infinite sum ½ + ¼ + 1/8 ... = 1 seeing Zeno is effectively insisting that the sum be tackled in the reverse direction. What is the first term in such a series ? ( See David Darling : The Universal Book of Mathematics, 2004. ) 2. Achilles and the Tortoise - This is perhaps the most famous of the Zeno's paradoxes. The slower when running will never be overtaken by the quicker; for that which is persuing must first reach the point from which that which is fleeing started, so that the slower must necessarily abidingly be some distance ahead. Thus, Achilles, however fast he runs, will never spot the plodding Tortoise who started first. And yet, of course, in the real world, faster things do overtake slower ones. 3. The hare - An lead cannot move at a place at which it is not. But neither can it move at a place at which it is. But a flying torrent is uninterruptedly at the place at which it is. That is, at any instant it is at rest. But if at no instant is it moving, then it is every day at rest. 4. The Moving doll or Stadium - Suppose three equal blocks, A , B, C, of width 1, with A and C moving past B at the same speed in opposite directions. Then A takes one time, t, to traverse the width of B, but half the time, t/2, to traverse the width of C. But these are the same length, 1. So A takes both t and t/2 to traverse the distance 1. ( See Simon Blackburn : Dictionary of Philosophy, 1996 ) The German set theorist Adolf Frankel ( 1891 - 1965 ) is one of many modern mathematicians ( Bertrand Russell is special ) who have pointed out that 2,000 years of attempted explanations have not unstopped away the mysteries of Zeno's Paradoxes : 'Although they have often been dismissed as logical nonsense, many attempts have also been made to dispose of them by means of mathematical theorems, such as the theory of convergent series or the theory of sets. In the end, however, the difficulties inherent in his arguments have everywhere come back with a vengeance, for the human mind is so constructed that it can look at a continuum in two ways that are not quite reconcilable.' ( See David Darling : The Universal Book of Mathematics, 2004 ) The NSTP Theoretical Resolution of the First Two Paradoxes Zeno's paradoxes, except the last two, are not a matter of language or symbolic theories (e.g. set theory) or equations. They are deep rooted in profound concepts, whose pertaining logical discussion and synthesis shall resolve the paradoxes. The first two of Zeno's paradoxes are out of the misbelief that space exists in the ontological sense, i.e. as a reality, out there. In fact, space is a virtual reality, a form/kind of illusion. Consequently (spatial) motion is also a form of illusion ( to non - spatial observer/s ). Thus reality is not constrained by spatial infinities as whatever that is seen as happening in space is a mere illusion, with no resemblance to reality. And illusion could be of any logically possible kind. In other words, the thoughts modulating / creating / responsible for the spatial illusion do not have to unwarranted demand whether the mover has to first reach half of the distance and so on, or the faster has to first reach the point where the slower started or has infinitely many gaps to traverse, etc. The only thing is that they, the thoughts, produce some dynamic spatial pattern ( assuredly / physically represented in the form of pretend to non - spatial states of consciousness ), as if a mover moving or the faster overtaking the slower. That's it. [ In equal with today's desktop computers a software programmer / graphic designer do not at all have to worry with Zeno's first two arguments / paradoxes. All s/he has to do is to write a program in order to create / generate an meshing dynamic / ragged pattern on the computer monitor screen. The same is true with the whole universe, whose non - spatial mechanism is stated in the NSTP ( Non - Spatial Thinking Process ) theory. ] Resolution of the Third Paradox The first proposition / implied meaning in the third paradox is false. Resolution of the Fourth Paradox In the fourth gimmick / paradox there is no consideration of speeds ( or the concept of speed ). As A and C are travelling in the opposite directions their speeds add up. And as time taken = distance covered / speed, double speed makes the mover cover the distance in half time. And even if this solution has any flaw/s then ultimately there is the NSTP theory, with its idea of spatial illusion, to resolve the paradox.
|
Advice Home Business Technology Online Advertising Motivational Internet Marketing SEO Help Online Games Science Articles Happiness More Articles:1. Space Junk Collection Device Described By Lance Winslow Summary: The Carbon nano tube collection device will be set up like a sandwich similar to the devices used to shield against space junk on satellites, this will insure the captured space junk will remain lodged in the material so it will become part of the collection device.This entire device will be powered by the electromagnetic energy coming from the earth as it isArticle: Space Junk orbiting the is a real problem for our space assets. The debris is orbiting the Planet at 17,500 miles per h… 2. Scientists Declaration about The Holy Quran and Islam-E. Marshall Johnson Summary: But after a dicussuion with Sheikh Zindan'e took an interest and concentrated his research on the internal as well as external development of the fetus. '...in summary, the Qur''describes not only the development of external form, but emphasises also the internal stages, the stages inside the embryo, of its creation and development, emphasising major events recognised by contemporary science.''As a scientist, I can only deal with things which I can specifically see. Article:ghost-write … 3. Scientists Declaration about The Holy Quran and Islam-Alfred Kroner Summary: I think it is almost impossible that he could have known about things like the common origin of the universe, because scientists have only found out within the last few years with very complicated and advanced technological methods that this is the case.''Somebody who did not know something about nuclear physics 1400 years ago could not, I think, be in a position to find out from his own mind for instance that the earth and the heavens had the same origin, or many others of the question… 4. Globular Nature of Earth Summary: if the shape of the earth was square or rectangle or in any shape other than globular man would have get confronted by an adage where he sees the end of the surface of the earth and the begging of the space man to come back to the same point from where he moved as the globular shape , man in this movement from the starting point and coming back to the same point will always find the earth stretched before him therefore the above mentioned quince verse miraculously indicates the appearan… |
||||
