Science

Older C-130 Hercules Aircraft Problematic

Learn Science on mps-science.com. Older C-130 Hercules Aircraft Problematic article will help answer your questions on Science.We at mps-science.com specialize in Science. Science at mps-science.com provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.

http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=2...621X00954&key=1

Here is the information about the C-130 that went down.

http://www.ruudleeuw.com/tanker130.htm

It happened once before in 1994

http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief2.asp?ev_id=...X94FA323&akey=1

and the NTSB knows there can be a problem this aircr

We have seriously seen surrounding the world many Lockheed C-130 Aircraft, which have had problems over the last five years. Many of these water craft have in excess of 100,000 total time airframe hours on them. The British lost on in Iraq, one crashed in Germany. Several have been lost fighting fires. The USMC lost one and the USAF lost one. Many of the older A, B and C models have been steadfast to moth balls, but many are still in being flown as we need them, they are superb work horses and journeyman of unbelievable feats. The newest versions of the C-130 are hardly the same craft with many new features, engines, airframe enhancements fan steel style props and a completely redesigned wing; thanks to NASA and Lockheed research and development. Luckily my ally is a USMC pilot in claim on a C-130 and he is able to fly the newer versions.

It is the older water craft that are the problem. afterwards reviewing the NTSB data on Fire Aircraft, I am concerned as many with the older craft fighting fires with these cattle and the thwart men who love to fly them for observably very little money. Here is some interesting information on this matter, which tells nearly plane crashes. If you will remember the Forestry C-130 plane crashes, those were older C-130s and they had been modified. Here is the C-130 NTSB report:

http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=2...621X00954&key=1

Here is the information all over the C-130 that went down.

http://www.ruudleeuw.com/tanker130.htm

It happened once prehistorically in 1994

http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief2.asp?ev_id=...X94FA323&akey=1

and the NTSB knows there can be a problem this water craft had over 20,000 flight hours total time on it and reduce which use to be used in the foreground phoschek and now the newest firefighting chemicals are very corrosive. In 2000 it happened en plus in France.

http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=2...212X21996&key=1

In 1984 there was supernumerary similar crash;

http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=2...214X41356&key=1

Then ditto in 1985.

http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=2...214X37289&key=1 .

I felt this was of concern and visited the GreyBull, WY port personally;

http://www.carwashguys.com/072302_5.shtml

These older C-130s and the older fire fighting aeroplane have super high time airframe hours on them and recently it was discovered that the wing spar boxes on these ship with high time airframe hours were the weak component bringing them down. The British C-130 was to have been insurgents albeit no one knows for sure. The issue now is when can we retire all these older C-130s and replace them with the newer redesigned versions with all the state of the art components developed by NASA and Lockheed? The ravel out is probably not this year or the next as we are cutting back expenditures in military budgets presently. How do you feel not far our aging fleet of older C-130s and their great service to our Nation? Isn’t it time to say thanks and retire them, they have done their duty, they’ll get their check, it is the new generations turn to start paying into the system. Think within earshot it.

More Articles: