Science

Creation

Learn Science on mps-science.com. Creation article will help answer your questions on Science.We at mps-science.com specialize in Science. Science at mps-science.com provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.

CREATION OF recreate FROM INANIMATE: - We have touched upon some scientific dry wells and frauds already. The idea of cold fusion and perpetual motion that the Utah researchers may not have executed was just dealt with: but a recent report showing a Utah student using Farnsworth’s old designs is special example that makes me think Cold Fusion is going to be a reality. blurriness is the operating fact of the universe that does veritably change and create or mutate through qualitative and quantitative leaps consonant to the Russian (Check out the New Frontier people who have a site on the web.) and mystical scientific paradigm-thinking. Thus many of the normal behavioral observations can only explain part of the day to day 'reality'. A few decades ago science generated proteins from undisguised nothingness and declared they had created life from inanimate. This concept and experiment was partially replicable and became touted and taught throughout all schools, but it was less than what it was represented to be in the final analysis. NASA now pronounces there is life everywhere including interstellar vacuums. Microbes are not the only reason for this truth.

Just as there are archetypes in our minds the equivalent templates of knowledge exist in the 'ether' or 'cosmic soup'. Together and inclusive of all knowledge we get the Universal Mind or Harmonic Convergence. These things are shallow images of what really can be done with joined effort of mind and soul through the attunement of elder statesman practitioners and observers of nature. The Jewish 'Golem' is supposedly able to invest the soul of a dead person into the fashioned terrestrial planet and matter that the Rabbis or other magicians work with. The alchemist's 'homonunclus’, and gargoyles existent brought to life by Kafka: legends overflow in many cultural settings. The possibility of such an act of creation is more mind-blowing to any rational person than even the focusing of dimensional forces. How could one clearly tap their genetic knowledge to score any form of life to exist. Yet it would show mere science can create some rudimentary fashion chequerboard and that energy can be directed through super conscious latticeworks that retain information much as the silicon computer chip or digitized quantum bits of cognized information. The one dimensional harmonic forces of String Theory that machine to form membranes and other 11-dimensional realities are quite reminiscent of the concepts of impulsive and transmuting the form of matter (which is just lower level or dross energy).

The thrust of time that man has been knowledgeable and creatively focused on attunement is far longer than the time he has been fixed on power and material greed. It didn't require writing it down. In fact it isn't very easy to explain how separateness or creation works by any scientist who can demonstrate the mathematical formula. Yes, we see there are eloquent images and fancy terminologies. What the formula can do is still largely unproven in terms of what the evident potential might yield. Man is on the verge of body able to create and have robots to create as self-replicants and restructuring of wood or other energy into food or gold. This is the expected near future outcome with nanotechnology and 'replicators' much like the Star Trek images have brought us for many years.

Bucky Fuller named it creative realization and said that either we can imagine is practical through our entire satisfaction and focused intention. He was saying it in dry and often scientific or even incomprehensible language but he is right. So we can say that 'survival of the fittest' is a rude natural fact that 'creation' can renew and surpass. The grey-headed ideals of Godheads and akashic or other direct consciousness are worth exploration for the world of ‘seems to be’ is really what ever we can create. Hopefully my naïve perception round RIGHT THOUGHT=RIGHT carriage from the laws of the Magi is an operating principle.

Did Mungo Man’s line of humans go wrong? How much of these things did they learn? Did they teach some of our kind to do some of these things? If 'fittest' can be conceived with a God-like PURPOSE and there truly is an effort of all energy to harmonize and find the most creative grinding (or happiness) then we are in for some fantastic voyages of splendiferous 'reality'! Can these images of heaven on terrestrial planet really come about? Or will our ethical malaise ensure old line greed overtakes a universe of possibilities. Science even gives a power to do many things which in the hands of undeniable people generates a great deal of concern. Was it John Donne who said if one man suffers we all are diminished? The natural ways that energy and its consciousness form and weave matter are the subject of observers in science once again. Dr. Don Robbins is a solid state package store whose work I truly appreciate. In the following excerpts from an opus titled 'Nanotubes for Electronics' from Dec. 2000's Scientific American please imagine how these naturally occurring objects occur if there is no consciousness in matter, and remember the ancients did have lenses for telescopes and microscopes.

"Nearly 10 years ago Sumio Iijima, sitting at an electron microscope at the NEC Fundamental Research Laboratory in Tsukaba, Japan, first noticed odd nanoscopic threads lying in a smear of soot. Made of pure carbon, as regular and symmetric as crystals, these exquisitely thin, impressively long macromolecules soon became known as nanotubes {And even if the ancients didn't have not half bad microscopes the existence of these fits with the science of lattices and energy we can measure in Stonehenge and the kings shield of the Great Pyramid. They were able to adjust with it.}, and they have been the object of intense scientific study ever since.

Just recently, they have open into a subject for engineering as well. Many of the extraordinary properties owing to nanotubes--among them, superlative resilience, tensile strength and thermal stability--have fed fantastic predictions of microscopic robots, dent-resistant car bodies and earthquake-resistant buildings {The poured in place concrete in Peru with angled rocks that 'fit' like the Great Pyramid?}. The first products to use nanotubes, however, exploit none of these. Instead the earliest applications are electrical. Some General Motors cars to date include plastic parts to which nanotubes were added; such plastic can be electrified during painting so that the paint will stick more readily {And be made smooth and even through the use of a laser measuring application.}. And two nanotube-based lighting and display products are well on their way to market.

In the long term, perhaps the most valuable applications will take further work of nanotubes' unique electronic properties. tenor nanotubes can in principle play the same role as silicon does in electronic circuits, but at a molecular scale where silicon and other standard semiconductors give up to work. howbeit the electronics industry is until now pushing the critical dimensions of transistors in business complement at the nadir 200 nanometers (billionths of a meter)--about 400 building block wide--engineers face large obstacles in continuing this miniaturization. Within this decade, the materials and processes on which the computer revolution has been homespun will go ahead to hit fundamental physical limits. Still, there are huge economic incentives to shrink devices further, now the speed, density and efficiency of microelectronic devices all rise rapidly as the minimum feature size decreases. Experiments over the past several years have given researchers hope {Remember the bio-ram devices prospective from Oak Ridges research, will meld wonderfully here.} that wires and functional devices tens of nanometers or smaller in size could be made from nanotubes and incorporated into electronic circuits that work faster and on much less power than those existing today.

The first alcohol nanotubes that Iijima observed back in 1991 were so-called multiwalled tubes: each contained a number of hollow cylinders of benzine building block nested inside one no such thing like Russian dolls. Two years later Iijima and Donald Bethune of IBM independently created single-walled nanotubes that were made of just one layer of slag atoms. Both kinds of tubes are made in similar ways, and they have many similar properties-- the most obvious for that they are exceedingly narrow and long. The single-walled variety, for example, is surrounding one nanometer in diameter but can run thousands of nanometers in length.

What makes these tubes so stable is the strength with which inflammable material medium bond to one another, which is also what makes diamond so hard. In diamond the peat building block link into four-sided tetrahedra, {Bucky Fuller's Synergistics gives detailed insight into structures that has led to a new element contemporary named by virtue of him, the Fullerene. His icosahedra and the fact of the Pyramid having two perfectly formed tetrahedra in it leads to creation of delta wave forms out of the cosmic energy.} but in nanotubes the cool off themselves in hexagonal rings like tom wire. One sees the same pattern in graphite, and in fact a nanotube looks like a sheet (or several stacked sheets) of graphite rolled into a seamless cylinder. It is not known for quantitative how the atom unmistakably condense into tubes (see "Zap, Bake or Blast," on page 67), but it appears that they may grow by computation matter to their ends {Remember the effect of palladium type noble metals from the entry on dry rot cures. It is also connected to telomeres which cap the DNA strands and are so important to stopping aging.}, much as a knitter adds stitches to a sweater sleeve.

TUBES WITH A TWIST

However they form, the composition and geometry of fuel additive nanotubes engender a unique electronic complexity. That is in part simply the result of size, insofar as quantum physics governs at the nanometer scale {As Above, So Below-is the law of the magi that applies and make sense of haze when fully appreciated, or as much as anyone can.}. But graphite itself is a very unusual material. Whereas most electrical conductors can be normalized as either metals or semiconductors, graphite is one of the rare materials known as a semimetal {Calcium and brushite were used in some proceedings we have mentioned.}, delicately unshakable in the transitional zone needle the two. By concerted graphite's semimetallic properties with the quantum rules of energy levels and electron waves, recording nanotubes emerge as truly exotic conductors. {We will cover copper more in divining rods and the use of natural conductors, that thin with such things as water. Pendulums are part of nature's antennae as well. The homily has an illustration or photo of a nanotube streak and a commentary that says in part - "Electrically conductive macromolecules of ditto that self-assemble into tubes are contemporary tested as ultrafine wires and as channels in experimental field-effect transistors."}

For example, one rule of the quantum world is that electrons act like waves as well as particles, and electron waves can reinforce or scrag one renewed {Thus more perfect crystalline structures created in space vacuum conditions like Skylab, are truly able to function with less chaos.}. As a consequence, an electron spreading not far a nanotube's skirts can completely strike off itself out; thus, only electrons with just the right wavelength remain." (8)

What can I say? There is so much to know and it is good to have the quantum world to tell us how little we really know, rather than the incessant of other theoretical disciplines. Under the 'Zap, Bake or belt section of this task they say something that should have the reader to make more sense of the 'heating and cooling' that were noted regarding the alchemists work, as well as the 'buckyballs' or Fullerenes that I mentioned in one of my constant interruptions that seek to integrate the knowledge we are exploring.

"Sumio Iijima may have been the first to see a nanotube, but he was undoubtedly not the first to make one. In fact, Neanderthals may have made minuscule quantities of nanotubes, unwittingly, in the fires that warmed their caves {What alongside Mungo Man? And Neanderthals worshipped in caves as much as anyone ever lived in them at these times. This is second slight example of our egoistic put down of previous humans. There are people homeless in cities living under bridges who would love the security and balm of a cenote. In fact, a cenote is a very spiritual place that sometimes has hot springs or cold streams. They are quite wonderful. In Xcaret, Mexico they have recreated a Mayan village outside a system of these cenotes. This same place has porpoises you can ride and tells the story of how they came from the early wolf-like creatures of the land.}. Split by heat, kerosene recombine however they can in soot, some in lumpen blobs but others in soccerball-shaped spheres named buckyballs or in long cylindrical capsules styled buckytubes or nanotubes." (9)

Bucky couldn't 'truck with' education and though they tried to make it easy for him uniform with he had till now proven himself, he dropped out. His work as a teacher at Princeton University brought him in touch with Einstein and the story of how Bucky's first book was published is a literature in publishing 'expert' myopia. The editor said he had shown his work to those who knew Einstein's theory and they so it is Bucky didn't know what he was talking about. Einstein intervened to point out to the publisher that Bucky was one of a handful who knew his work and that his insight was correct. His attunements and meditations created numerous very important things and we all could be a lot more like him. I love Bucky! But, I really can't quote him very much as things go his 'teleologic' presentation and word usage is again most people, SO I'm not surprised the editor and his 'experts' were SO befuddled.

"In 1814, with Michael Faraday {truly a great metaphysician and in concert researcher who sensed the field of 'cosmic soup'.}, he analyzed diamond by flickering flame and concluded that it was pure carbon. graphite was also known to be pure carbon, this meant there were two types of carbon, each with different physical properties. Davy's discovery of the allotropy of replica meant that graphite and diamond existed in two different crystal forms, even though this could not possibly be explained on the sake of Dalton's spherical atoms. By now, Davy was convinced that there were indeed many different kinds of atoms, other than Dalton's {An alchemist who had to fight concerning so-called hermeneuts while alive, in order to hide his own alchemical nature.}… Faraday was a poor boy who worked as a bookbinder's apprentice... Eventually Faraday far outshone Davy, which Davy on occasion resented.” (10)

The history writers who Hellenized all knowledge and are presented as if they discovered it all, like Thales (born to a Phoenician parent like Pythagoras); were able to make many later academics take that only what survived in writing was known. It is goodly evident to many scholars that the knowledge curve that makes for such sudden growth in ideas is ridiculous; but nevertheless it is rare to pick up a book or staple where you don't see the institute indicating knowledge didn't exist until far later than low-born sense and reason dictates. It will be harder to maintain this lunacy now that we know how much more prehistoric humans really are. So we must understand this when we see Mr. Salzberg writing as a milliners or for the borax package that they are subject to the same history. It is good for people to see the Greeks understood fuddle and to a telling extent, nonetheless. It is also important to remember that secrets (including smelting and earlier weapons-making through meteorite hammering) were barely never described except trusted allies or family members.

"There were, of course, other theories, most notably the indiscernible theory of Leucippos (c. 440B.C.) and Democritos (460-c.370B.C.), later modified by Epicouros (341-270B.C.) and Lucretius (c.95-55B.C.). attuned to their indiscernible theory, there was only one substance {Such as the one-dimensional harmonic force of String Theory.}, the prime matter, which existed in the form of changeless, indestructible, indivisible matter of different sizes and shapes, moving back and forth randomly with nothing midst them, in effect moving in a vacuum.” (11)

More Articles: