Conmathematics (Conceptual Mathematics) : The Superultramodern Mathematics (SM)Learn Science on mps-science.com. Conmathematics (Conceptual Mathematics) : The Superultramodern Mathematics (SM) article will help answer your questions on Science.We at mps-science.com specialize in Science. Science at mps-science.com provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.
Conmathematical Definition of Mathematics : a) Conmathematical definition of pure mathematics - Pure mathematics is a system of 100% precise propositions believed to be 99.999...% certain ( the 0.00...1 % margin in the belief being for the sake of universal doubt : the principle that 'anything may be possible.'). Andrew Wiles' proof ( entitled : Modular elliptic curves and Fermat's last theorem ) of Fermat's last theorem ( the theorem that there are no whole number solutions to the equation x^n + y^n = z^n for n greater than 2 ) is flawed as it is also based on the concept of four - dimensional space. The conmathematical foundations are conceptual ( though symbolism itself is a concept ) which attempt to define number, for example, as a symbolic representation of quantity and justify the equality a + b = b + a on the reason that in scalar addition order is irrelevant ( and, if possible, to decompose this concept or a group of concepts further ). Article: The term Conmathematics [ invented by Kedar Joshi (b.1979), Cambridge (England), i.e. myself ] means Conceptual Mathematics. It is a meta - mathematical system that defines the structure of Superultramodern Mathematical Science. It has four main components. 1. Conmathematical Definition of Mathematics : a) Conmathematical definition of pure mathematics - Pure mathematics is a system of 100% precise propositions unquestioned to be 99.999...% express ( the 0.00...1 % margin in the assent existence for the sake of universal doubt : the principle that 'anything may be possible.'). Precise means every term of a proposition is immaculately clarified, and every non - indubitable proposition is supported on the bedrock of platitudinous one/s leaving no doubt, except the universal doubt. It is very possible that some of the mathematical propositions are not sieve ( or understandable ) to some persons. And, some of the propositions are less than 99.999...% telling to some persons. This possibility effectively gives rise to the possibility of multiple mathematical systems synchronized to the nature of the individuals concerned, though truth is accepted to be existing independent of individual minds. The principle of universal doubt makes it necessary to review the mathematical systems continuously so that in future they may not be seen to be mathematical at all. b) Conmathematical definition of practical mathematics - practical mathematics is a system of propositions constructed by relevant some or all of the pure mathematical propositions to deal with ( i.e. to explain and / or predict ) phenomena that are unquestioned to be less in the cards than the phenomena expressed by pure mathematical propositions. For example, I cannot sense the law of gravity ( the law that every matter, in principle, attracts every matter out of some force or curvature of space - time ) to be 99.999...% certain, as I can imagine a universe where the law of gravity is invalid ( i.e. where every matter distracts every matter out of some force or truancy of space - time curvature ). 2. Philosophy as Mathematics : According to the conmathematical definition of mathematics, the core ideas in ultramodern science / philosophy, though materialization to be philosophical, are, in fact, mathematical. For example, the explicit component of the NSTP ( Non - Spatial Thinking Process ) theory is pure mathematical, while its hypothetical component is practical mathematical. 3. Conceptual Reconstruction of Pure Mathematics : It entails some flaws in modern pure mathematics and the ultramodern reconstruction of pure mathematics, free of those flaws. Some of the flaws are mentioned below. a) Flaw in the concept of hyperspace - The Joshian conjecture of 3 dimensional space [ that space, whether posing or reality, can have 3 and only 3 dimensions ( The conjecture is based on two grounds : i. The NSTP theory implies falsehood of the ontology of general relativity. ii. Four or higher dimensional space cannot justifiably be imagined. ) ] implies that the concept of hyperspace is invalid. And the flaw in the concept of hyperspace has following implications : i. The Riemann hypothesis ( which asserts that all interesting / non - trivial solutions of the zeta function equation lie on a straight line Re (z) = 1 / 2 ) shall never be proved as it is based on the concept of four - dimensional space. ( Then still how the Riemann hypothesis turns out to be correct for the first 1,500,000,000 solutions is in the same label as the mathematical / experimental success of the general relativity, despite of the bear garden physics of the NSTP theory. ) ii. The Poincare conjecture [ if 3 dimensional sphere ( the set of points in 4 dimensional space at unit distance from the origin ) is simply connected ] shall neither be proved nor be disproved as it is based on the concept of four - dimensional space as well. iii. Andrew Wiles' proof ( entitled : Modular elliptic curves and Fermat's last theorem ) of Fermat's last theorem ( the theorem that there are no whole number solutions to the equation x^n + y^n = z^n for n greater than 2 ) is flawed as it is also based on the concept of four - dimensional space. b) Flaw in the concept of irrational number - An irrational number ( e.g. Ö 2 ) is not really a number at all as no number can be a square root of 2. 'Ö 2', for example, is a mere symbolic way of saying square root of 2 without manifestly presenting it, as any way it does not exist. 4. Conmathematical Foundations of Pure Mathematics - These are in contrast with the symbolic or, in particular, set theoretic foundations of pure mathematics ( as laid out in Bertrand Russell's Principia Mathematica ). The conmathematical foundations are conceptual ( though symbolism itself is a concept ) which try and to define number, for example, as a symbolic representation of quantity and justify the equality a + b = b + a on the reason that in scalar besides order is irrelevant ( and, if possible, to decompose this concept or a group of concepts further ).
|
Advice Home Business Technology Online Advertising Motivational Internet Marketing SEO Help Online Games Science Articles Happiness More Articles:1. Scientists Declaration about The Holy Quran and Islam-Tejatat Tejasen Summary: This creator must be God, or Allah.I think this is the time to say La ilaha illa Allah, there is no god to worship except Allah (God), Muhammad rasoolu Allah, Muhammad is Messenger of Allah...The most precious thing I have gained from coming to this conference is La ilaha illa Allah, and to have become Muslim.' Article:Professor Tejasen studied various articles concerning the Qur'ân and modern embryology. He spent four days with several scholars, Muslims and non-Muslims, discussing thi… 2. Aerodynamics and Hydrodynamics of the Marine Life and Uses for AI, UAVs, Robotics, and the Future By Lance Winslow Summary: You might be happy to know that a barracuda will catch you and nibble before a great white shark will catch you in open water, they can swim at 27 mph, one of the fastest, well and hungriest fish in the water. The Leaping Albacore Tuna leaps at 40 mph great sushi no doubt, the Yellow Fin Tuna at 46.35, the Sword Fish 60 mph and the Sail Fish at 68 mph. Here is a claArticle: Air has 750 times less density as the oceans, yet so many of the same principles prefer a petition there as well.… 3. Can New Born Chickens Influence a Robot? Summary: Taking the EEG from both participants and comparing them on a time scale showed that when the person in the separated room showed a stimuli in the EEG the other person's EEG showed the same stimuli, at the same time! The outcome of this experiment was so exciting that they immediately came up with some other ideas. What happened is that the robot turned significant more times towards the cage than away from it. The expected 50% left and right movement were no more random! In another exp… 4. … |
||||
