Science

A Brief History of Creation - Part One

Learn Science on mps-science.com. A Brief History of Creation - Part One article will help answer your questions on Science.We at mps-science.com specialize in Science. Science at mps-science.com provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.

In spite of the fact that it is impossible to prove that anything exists beyond one's perception since any such proof would involve one's perception (I observed it, I heard it, I thought about it, I calculated it, and etc.), science deals with a so-called objective reality 'out there,' beyond one's perception professing to describe Nature objectively (as if there was a Nature or reality external to one's perception). As will be shown in the following, the required paradigm shift from 'perception is our reality fixed within an objective world,' to 'perception is reality without the need of an objective world 'out there,'' is provided by a dynamic logical structure. However, this lawfulness, as we shall see later on, is the precise lawfulness that creates perception, the process of defi

In spite of the fact that it is impossible to prove that aught exists the grave one's perception since any such proof would involve one's perception (I observed it, I heard it, I thought near upon it, I studied it, and etc.), science deals with a so-called objective reality 'out there,' one's perception professing to describe Nature objectively (as if there was a Nature or reality external to one's perception). The shocking impact of Matrix was precisely the valid possibility that what we credited to be reality was but our perception; however, this was presented through showing a real reality wherein the perceived reality was a computer simulation. Many who toy with the idea that perhaps, indeed, we are computer simulations, deviate towards questions, such as, who could create such software and what kind of hardware would be needed for such a feat. when such questions suppose that reality is our perception, they also axiomatically presuppose the existence of an objective deterministic world 'out there' that nevertheless must be responsible for how we perceive our reality. This is a major mistake emphasizing technology and algorithms instead of trying to discover the nature of reality and the structure of creation. As will be shown in the following, the required paradigm shift from 'perception is our reality fixed within an objective world,' to 'perception is reality without the need of an objective world 'out there,'' is provided by a dynamic logical structure. The Holophanic loop logic is responsible for a consistent and complete worldview that not only describes, but also creates whatever can be perceived or experienced.

Stating that it is impossible to prove the existence of aught farther one's perception is not saying there is nothing outside perception, only that if there is anything, then whatever that is, is indefinite. It could be argued that the existence of physical laws, the universal perception that the orange falls to the ground is proof of an objective reality. However, this universal malleability is also our perception. It could be argued that if we cannot decide what to perceive, and everybody perceives the same physical reality, then there must be some lawfulness that dictates how we perceive and therefore, this lawfulness could be external to our perception. However, this lawfulness, as we shall see later on, is the precise lawfulness that creates perception, the process of definition, which is not external to perception (this process creates the perceived and the perceiver, which then gives meaning to this process - a loop - but apropos that, later). It could be argued, that hitting our knee on the table - whether we allow in the table or not - will hurt. The table is external to our body, but not to our perception. What then is perception? It is relating, a process of definition, defining and thereby rendering meaningful what has been perceived.

What then is this process of definition? It is creating pale within which one's perception gains meaning. The word 'definition' comes from the Latin de finire, meaning, making finite or limited. In Hebrew, definition is HAGDARA (הגדרה), meaning, to border. Any definition necessarily implies what the definition is not, or stated differently, to have meaning, whatever is defined explicitly includes the meaning by implicitly excluding everything else. Consequently, to define means to place the defined object within boundary that by default create something life to come the of the definition. What is this something over and above the defined? The implicitly excluded everything else, or in other words, the indefinite. The paramount importance of incorporating the indefinite within a consistent logical structure cannot be overemphasized. The indefinite itself is a paradox, and incorporating it within the Holophanic logical structure engenders the loop of Creation where the dynamic structure of paradoxes is both the creative force of existence, and also the proof of the necessity of existence.

To plunger grasp the impetus of Creation, let's look at the indefinite and paradoxes. What does 'indefinite' mean? any as long as it is not specified (not defined); that appears both within and to boot the bound of the definition and thereby rendering the hanging superfluous, which means, no border, no definition. If nevertheless we would move to define the notion 'indefinite,' then that's a paradox insofar as if we succeed, then it is defined, which contradicts its meaning - its indefiniteness - and the word 'indefinite' means that it cannot be defined. This is an example of a paradox, that in essence means, if it is what it is, then it is not what it is, yet if it is not what it is, then it is what it is. A paradox is a creature that consists of a structure (how it is defined, the dynamic process on its way to stabilization) that contradicts its significance (what it is, the stabilized entity). What characterizes a paradox is the motion among its structure and significance, where the structure implies that its significance contradicts its structure, and vice versa.

Another example of a paradox would be 'wholeness.' Wholeness (totality, infinite, boundless) can only be wholeness if we can find a way to define it so that it includes everything and there is nothing otherwise it. However, if we define wholeness, then to have meaning, it must be bordered within the walls of the definition, which implies that there is something in addition this border, in which case it is not wholeness. Or in more formal language, wholeness is only wholeness if it is not wholeness, which is an inconsistency. If we are satisfied with that, then we have completed the definition of wholeness. However, if we try to include the beyond created by our earlier definition within the boundary of our next hazard at defining wholeness, then we gain a new definition of wholeness, which by the sheer structure of the process of defining creates a new beyond. In this case, the process of defining wholeness will be consistent but incomplete, and wholeness will remain indefinite.

Contemplating the paradox of Creation, the advanced in life Egyptian myth of Creation springs to mind, the myth of the self-creating god, Amun (or Amon). Amun masturbated and swallowed his semen, agreeable to which he spit it out in the form of a ball, thereby impregnating his mother, the sky. And only then, was he born. Thus Amun was his own father. Those pious who discovered the illustrated version of this myth in Karnak covered up the erect phallus of Amun, and with it, this story of Creation was laid into obscurity. The Holophanic model of Creation could regard this Egyptian myth as Amun retromorphously creating himself. I have fabricated the word retromorphous to mean, defining in retrospect, turning non-being into the potential of whatever the observation is made from, or in other words, creating the past from the present, creating the source from its outcome, which is the floor of complexity in the context of the loop logic. That is, only thereafter Amun was born can he give meaning to his mother, the potential from which he emanated and to the process that created him (as represented by masturbation and incest) whereby he was born. Of course, neither the sky nor the masturbating Amun have meaning until Creation takes place de facto and Amun emerges. I find this an enticing illustration of the essential paradox of existence.

So how can there be something from nothing?

To be continued... © Clara Szalai


Burn The Fat Feed The Muscle. - Diet & Weight Loss Secrets of Bodybuilders and Fitness Models: #1 Best Selling Diet & Fitness E-Book In Internet History!
CashCreation 99.9% Automated Income. - Up to $300 per day 99.9% Automatically in 15 Minutes with CashCreation.Com.


Article Index: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30

More Articles: