WILL A NUCLEAR "ARMAGEDDON" BE THE LAST WAR? (PART 1)Learn Science on mps-science.com. WILL A NUCLEAR "ARMAGEDDON" BE THE LAST WAR? (PART 1) article will help answer your questions on Science.We at mps-science.com specialize in Science. Science at mps-science.com provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.
Instruments of death were freely used -- poison gas, automatic weapons, huge canons, napalm bombs, atomic bombs. When two atom bombs landed, one in Hiroshima and the other in Nagasaki, Japan in 1945, thousands perished in a twinkle of an eye - Hiroshima (80,000), Nagasaki (73,000). Now look at this statistics: World War II took about 55 million lives (four times the casualties of World War I). Hear Carl Sagan again: 'There 's no such thing as a winnable nuclear war because its aftermath would be so appalling that the survivors would envy the dead'. But just before you choose either to die or survive a nuclear war (not to talk of the nuclear winter), let's see what would happen if nuclear bombs start raining now! Copyright ' 2002, all rights reserved About the Author: ARTHUR ZULU, The Most Controversial Writer in the World, is the author of the best - selling book, HOW TO WRITE A BEST-SELLER. Article: Title: WILL A NUCLEAR “ARMAGEDDON” BE THE LAST WAR? (PART 1) Author: Arthur Zulu Contact Author: mailto: controversialwriter@yahoo.com Copyright: Copyright © Arthur Zulu 2002 Word Count: 663 Web Address: http://www.1stbooks.com/bookview/10975 Publishing Guidelines: Permission is granted to publish this play electronically or in print as long as the bylines are included. A courtesy copy of your publication would be appreciated. WILL A NUCLEAR “ARMAGEDDON” BE THE LAST WAR? (Part 1) By Arthur Zulu There is a mad competition going on right now at a stuffy petrol station by a gather around of rascals. Each one is clutching a box of matches. Who will be the winner of the contest? The first person to strike a match! Now, suppose you were a spectator at the contest. And suppose the rascals not wanting to be whipped in the game, lit their matches simultaneously. What will happen to you, the rascals and the filling station? Everyone will vaporize! But that’s a small thing -- a picnic in a park, when compared to the threat of the immediate thermal nuclear “Armageddon”. Nuclear apologists set store by strongly that a nuclear holocaust is the greatest threat to our survival. So when you talk of the Big Crunch, Asteroids, Space aliens, or a plague wiping out edification on earth, the joke is: “Here comes the dreamer!” True, the idea that man will self-destruct -- destroy himself in an all - out war, is not new. “War”, consonant to a historian, “is a constant in history”. Right from the remaining times to the present, it has been an instrument for the survival of nations. No wonder it has been said that if you want peace, prepare for war. But soon, that old maxim will analogy to: “If you want to end the world, prepare for war”. Forget the United Nations. Their work does not include the prevention of war, nor the prevention of the world’s destruction. Look at these quotations and you will find out that this is not a joking matter: “We are perilously near to a new international anarchy” -- The Washington Post. “The proliferation of super weapons is now the most dangerous specter facing this planet” -- CRITICAL MASS by Williams E. Burrows and Roberts Windrem. “There are now more than 50,000 nuclear weapons, … enough to obliterate a million Hiroshimas… There is little question that our global civility would be destroyed” -- Carl Sagan. “The outbreak of the war in 1914 is the great turning point of the history of humanity.” -- Peter Munch. “Everything would get straighten out and better. This was the world I was born in… Suddenly, unexpectedly, one morning in 1914 the whole thing came to an end” -- Harold Macmillan. “Civilization is going downhill. Very definitely … when edification goes downhill, the whole planet goes down” -- Lewis Mumford. Those are frightening things to hear. But things never have been the same since the world went mad in 1914. Instruments of death were freely used -- poison gas, quick weapons, huge canons, napalm bombs, corpuscular bombs. When two atom bombs landed, one in Hiroshima and the other in Nagasaki, Japan in 1945, thousands perished in a twinkle of an eye - Hiroshima (80,000), Nagasaki (73,000). Now look at this statistics: World War II took prevalent 55 million lives (four times the casualties of World War I). Yet, all the nuclear weapons possessed by the superpowers equal six thousand Second World Wars! And the nuclear weapons possessed by the United States alienated can kill every living human on wanderer today more than 12 times! So, forget the millions that died during the world wars (that’s origination play). Forget the more than 35 million souls that have died since the end of world war II in more than 150 wars (that’s a picnic at the Beach). Forget the over 100 million persons that died in the last long hundred alone, from wars and “ethnic cleansing” (that’s women’s war). And do not mind the fact that as you read this, haphazardly 12 wars are going on passing by the world (like a tea party). But when a full-scale nuclear tsunami breaks out, this planet will be in darkness, and by the time the thick smoke dissipates, you will raise a high five (just in case you still have five fingers), if you survive. Hear Carl Sagan again: “There ‘s no such thing as a winnable nuclear war seeing that its remainder would be so atrocious that the survivors would envy the dead”. But just erst you finicky either to die or survive a nuclear war (not to talk of the nuclear winter), let’s see what would happen if nuclear bombs start raining now! Copyright © 2002, all rights reserved About the Author: ARTHUR ZULU, The Most Controversial Writer in the World, is the constructor of the best - selling book, HOW TO WRITE A BEST-SELLER. Download your copy and FREE excerpt at : http://www.1stbooks.com/bookview/10975. For FREE writing helps, mailto : controversialwriter@yahoo.com
|
Advice Home Business Technology Online Advertising Motivational Internet Marketing SEO Help Online Games Science Articles Happiness More Articles:1. How Albert Einstein Saw Things A Little Differently By Saleem Rana Summary: Albert Einstein had just administered an examination to an advanced class of Physics students.As he left the building, he was followed out by one of his teaching assistants.'Excuse me, sir,' said the shy assistant, not quite sure how to tell the great man about his blunder.'Yes?' said Einstein.'Um, eh, it's abArticle: Albert Einstein had just administered an examination to an too soon predicament of Physics students.As he left the building, he was followed out by one of his teaching a… 2. Ultra Thin Space Suits, just a concept By Lance Winslow Summary: Now then please view this company and Blood Coagulations products by: Z-Medica Corporationhttp://www.z-medica.comWhat if the new super thin skin, which the NASA is contemplating for astronauts contained between the linings or in side a normal uniform a lining which if the skin broke would put this product into the wound? Article: The space suits we saw on the first Moon visit were too large and bulky. We need Ultra thin space suits, but what if you unevenness the skin underneath. You c… 3. Spray on Dirt for Camouflage By Lance Winslow Summary: Since the solution and paint is not water soluble it needs to be able to be removed relatively easily with some other method, this way as the vehicles move from place to place the camouflage must be changed to keep the vehicle, soldiers and convoy safe. Article: Super sticky spray on dirt or mud simulation varnishing or wash-off-able paint is needed to protect our troops in combat. It can be used for plane bottoms, helicopters and humvees. Sounds like a good idea right? But how would… 4. Can New Born Chickens Influence a Robot? Summary: Taking the EEG from both participants and comparing them on a time scale showed that when the person in the separated room showed a stimuli in the EEG the other person's EEG showed the same stimuli, at the same time! The outcome of this experiment was so exciting that they immediately came up with some other ideas. What happened is that the robot turned significant more times towards the cage than away from it. The expected 50% left and right movement were no more random! In another exp… |
||||
